The tech world is bracing for a landmark legal showdown that could reshape how social media platforms interact with young users. Meta and YouTube are currently on trial, facing serious allegations that they’ve deliberately designed their platforms to be as addictive as gambling platforms, specifically targeting children.

Opening statements revealed shocking internal documents from both companies that suggest a deliberate strategy of user manipulation. Plaintiff attorneys argue that these tech giants aren’t just creating apps, but constructing “digital casinos” engineered to keep users, especially children, constantly engaged.

Internal Google and Meta documentation reportedly uses startling language, with some documents literally referring to their platforms as “attention casinos” and using imagery of gambling environments. Even more damning are quotes from employees comparing their work to drug dealing, with some admitting they’re “basically pushers” and that their platform operates “like a drug”.

The trial is part of a broader legal movement targeting social media’s impact on youth mental health. Multiple school districts and legal teams are consolidating their cases, seeking accountability similar to the landmark 1998 tobacco settlement. Notably, Snap and TikTok have already settled similar lawsuits, potentially indicating industry-wide recognition of problematic design practices.

Mark Zuckerberg and YouTube CEO Neal Mohan are both scheduled to testify, which underscores the trial’s significance. The plaintiffs are seeking substantial damages and potentially transformative changes to how social media platforms engage with younger users.

This case arrives amid global conversations about digital wellness. Countries like Australia have already taken aggressive steps, banning social media for users under 16. The current trial could set precedent for how tech companies are held accountable for designing potentially addictive digital experiences.

While Big Tech has historically navigated legal challenges successfully, this trial represents a critical moment in understanding the ethical responsibilities of digital platforms in protecting vulnerable users. The outcome could fundamentally change how social media companies design their products and interact with younger audiences.